MANAGEMENT CONTROL IN A BUSINESS NETWORK: NEW CHALLENGES FOR ACCOUNTING BY DR. ROLAND BARDY
Adjunct Professor, Fachhochschule Worms, Germany; Adjunct Instructor, Goizueta Business School, Emory University, USA; Director (Retired) of BASF Aktiengesellschaft, Ludwigshafen, Germany. e-mail: rbardy@t–online.de, Tel. + 49 621 41 61 76
Modern enterprises thrive on connectivity. In an environment of highly interconnected business we must look at management accounting as an activity that provides concepts to coordinate partially independent management systems as well as highly interdependent systems. There is a mutual influence between accounting and organisation. Horngren et al. have shown that management accounting is an instrument to influence the behavior of managers in a way that it enhances the attainment of organisational objectives (Horngren, Bhimani, Foster and Datar, 2005). So, management accounting apparently has to be customised, the need for which has been analysed in the contexts of departmental interdependence (Gerdin, 2005), supply chains (Knight and Harland 2005) and the Internet (Sheehan 2005). Scarce sources are available, however, for accountants who look to develop new skills and techniques when their companies partner a business network (Håkansson and Lind, 2004). This paper considers from where accountants may derive guidance for this work, and how accountants’ work can support the objectives of a network.
The needs to customise are manifold, and consisting of two directions, as follows: 1. Traditional reporting and budgeting need to be adapted to reflect varying input and output; standards of performance need to be created which measure and verify the contribution to common business processes; and, adequate process standards need to be elaborated. Further, the accountants will need to devise new costing and billing procedures that satisfy the requirements of diverse network partners, and they will also need to establish profit-sharing rules and appropriate investment incentives. 2. The methods and instruments of management accounting in a business network need to comply with the conditions of an environment, where respective partners have diverging business objectives, mutual trust is needed (but distrust will possibly prevail at the outset), and bargaining power will be exploited over all sorts of issues. Co-ordination will be of the utmost importance, as will openness, a willingness to share risks, and rewards. The objective is to gain competitive advantage, resulting in better business performance than would be achieved by the firms individually.
What has been enumerated here comes very close to the definition of a business network , defining elements for which include: combining diverse business objectives, gaining competitive advantage that would not be achieved individually, mutual trust and co-ordination, restricted membership; specific business objectives, and sharing risks and rewards (Rosenfeld, 1995).
Neither of the two directions (above) are clearly visible in the literature, an example of where the gap between accountancy practitioners and academics is painstakingly felt (Pearce, 2004). One reason for this may be the way that management accounting knowledge is delivered – i.e., too “regulated”, too casuistic, and/or overly focused on reporting requirements (Spender, 2005). A different reason may be the way that research is conducted – i.e., too case-specific, too much oriented towards output factors such as ‘value’ and ‘performance’, and less focussed on input-like methods and techniques. When input in management accounting relates to data and instruments, then it suggests that a look at traditional instruments will help to find the appropriate direction. Traditional management accounting, it is argued, has much to offer in terms of developing methods of decision-support and of management control in business networks. This paper explores...
Bibliography: Anderson, E. and Jap, S. D. (2005) “The dark side of close relationships”, in Sloan Management Review, Vol. 46, No. 3 (Spring), pp. 75 – 82.
Axelrod, R. (1984) The evolution of cooperation, Basic Books, New York.
Baldenius, T. (2000) “Intrafirm trade, bargaining power, and specific investments”, Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 5, pp. 27 –56.
Beyer, J. M. and Browning, L.D. (1999) “Transforming an industry in crisis: charisma, routinization and supportive cultural leadership”, Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 10, pp. 483–520.
Brandon, C. H. and Drtina, R.E. (1996) Management accounting: strategy and control, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Burns, J. and Baldvinsdottir, G. H. (2005) “An institutional perspective of the accountant’s new roles – the interplay of contradictions and praxis”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 14, No 4, pp. 725-57.
Cäker, M. (2001) “The meaning of inter-organizational management accounting”, working paper, presented at ENROAC 3rd workshop (Groningen, 2003).
Carr, C., and Ng, J. (1995) “Total cost control: Nissan and its supplier partnerships”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 6, pp. 345–365.
Degarmo, P., Sullivan, W. and Canada, J. (1984) Engineering Economy, MacMillan, London and New York.
Dekker, H.C. (2000) “Control of inter-organizational relationships. Theory development and an empirical investigation”, working paper at EIASM workshop on ‘New Directions in Management Accounting’ (Brussels, 2000).
Fayol, H. (1919/49) General and Industrial Management, London.
Fligstein, N. (1990) The transformation of corporate control, Harvard University Press, Boston MA.
Gerdin, J. (2005) “Management accounting systems design in manufacturing departments: an empirical investigation using a multiple contingencies approach”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 30, pp. 99–126.
Gottinger, H.W. (2003) Economics of network industries, New York.
Grandori, A. and Soda, G. (1995) “Inter-firm networks: Antecedents, mechanisms and forms”, Organization Studies, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 183-214.
Gulati, R., Nohria, N. and Zaheer, A. (2000) “Strategic networks”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 203–215.
Heckert, J.B. and Willson, J.D. (1963) Controllership, New York.
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2002) CFO 2010 - the role of the Chief Financial Officer in 2010, January.
Ireland, R. and Bruce, R. (2000) “CPFR - only the beginning of collaboration”, Supply Chain Management Review, Vol. 4 Sept/Oct, pp. 80–92.
Jarillo, J.C. (1993) Strategic networks: creating the borderless organization, Butterworth-Heinemann (Elsevier).
Johansson, I.-L. and Baldvinsdottir, G. H. (2003) “Accounting for trust: some empirical evidence”, Management Accounting Research, Vol.14 No 3, pp. 219–34.
Johansson R. and Borell, K. (1999) “Central steering and local networks: old-age care in Sweden”, Public Administration Vol. 77, pp. 585-98.
Kaplan, R. and Atkinson, A. (1998) Advanced management accounting, 3rd ed., Prentice-Hall, New York.
Kato, Y. (1993) “Target costing support systems”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 4 No 1, pp. 33–47.
Khanna, T., Gulati, R. and Nohria, N. (1998) “The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation and relative scope”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 193–210.
Knight, L. and Harland C. (2005) “Managing supply networks: organizational roles in network management”, European Management Journal, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 281–292.
Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. and Bies, R. (1998) “Trust and distrust: new relationships and realities”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, pp. 438–358.
Lewin, A. (2004) Management accounting - information strategy, Elsevier Books, Oxford.
Love, J. H. and Roper, S. (2005) “Economists ' perceptions versus managers ' decisions: an experiment in transaction-cost analysis”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 29, pp. 19-36.
Luhmer, A. (2000) “Participative budgeting for responsibility centers with interrelated activities”, Discussion Paper, Otto von Guericke University of Magdeburg, Available: http://www.uni-magdeburg.de/bwl1/luhmer/ABB.pdf.
McGrath, R. G. and Macmillan, I. (2000) The entrepreneurial mindset. Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty McGraw-Hill, New York.
Montgomery, J. (1998) “Towards a role-theoretic conception of embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 104 No. 1, pp. 92-125.
Mouritsen, J., Hansen, A. and Hansen, C. O. (2001) “Inter-organizational controls and organizational cornpetencies: episodes around target cost management/functional analysis and open book accounting”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, pp. 221-224.
Nicolini, D., Tomkins, C., Holti, R., Oldman, A., and M. Smalley, M. (2000) “Can target costing and whole life costing be applied in the construction industry? Evidence from two case studies”, British Journal of Management, Vol 11 No. 4, pp. 303-24.
Nishimura, A. (2003) Management accounting and feed forward perspectives, Palgrave, London.
Nørreklit, H., Nørreklit, L
Nunan, F. (1999) “Policy network transformation: the implementation of the EC Directive on packaging and packaging waste”, Public Administration, Vol. 77 No. 3, pp. 621-38.
Pearce, J. L. (2004) “What do we know and how do we really know it”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 29, pp. 175–79.
Picot, A., Ripperger, T. and Wolff, B. (1996) “The fading boundaries of the firm”, The Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol.152, pp. 65-79.
Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R. I., (1999) “Knowing what to do is not enough: turning knowledge into action”, California Management Review, Fall, pp.83-108.
Porter, M. (1985) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance, McGraw Hill, New York.
Rosenfeld, S.A. (1995) Industrial strength strategies: regional business clusters and public policy, Aspen Institute, Washington DC.
SAP (2004) EAI Strategies, Available: www.sap-si.com/services/cross-industry/connectivity
Seifert, D. (2002) Collaborative planning, forecasting, and replenishment, Galileo, Bonn.
Sheehan, N.T. (2005) “Why old tools won’t work in the ‘new’ knowledge economy”, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 53–60.
Simon, H. A. (1976) Administrative Behavior, New York, MacMillan.
Spender, J. C. (2005) “Management as a regulated profession”, opening address at the EURAM 2005 Keynote Session, Available: http://www.euram2005.de/site/spendertext.pdf.
Snow, C., Miles, R and Coleman, G. jr. (1992) “Managing 21st century network organizations”, Organizational Dynamics (Winter), pp. 5-20.
Tomkins, C. (2001) “Interdependencies, trust and information in relationships, alliances and networks”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 26, p. 163–76.
Tukel, O. I. and Rom W. O. (2001) “An empirical investigation of project evaluation criteria“, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 400-16.
Van der Meer-Kooistra, J. and Vosselman, E. G. (2000) “Management control of interfirm transactional relationships: the case of industrial renovation and maintenance”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol 25, pp. 51-77.
VCAP (2005) Value Chain Analysis and Management Program, University of Michigan Industrial and Operations Engineering Department, Available: http://www.engin.umich.edu/VCAP
Please join StudyMode to read the full document